The Impact of Green Finance on the Penetration of Alternative-Fuel Vessels and Associated Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction

Authors

  • Pei Liu Department of Supply Chain Management, Business School, Shandong University, Weihai 264209, China Author
  • Dong-Ping Song Department of Operations and Supply Chain Management, School of Management, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZH, UK Author

Keywords:

Maritime transport, alternative fuels, green credit, carbon trading, GHG emission

Abstract

The renewal of vessel fleet with the penetration of alternative- and green-fuel vessels is critical for the maritime transport sector to meet the net-zero greenhouse gas (GHG) emission target around 2050. However, the high upfront investment of alternative-fuel vessels is a major barrier to their market penetration. This study proposes a system dynamics method to investigate the impact of green credit and carbon trading on the penetration of alternative-fuel vessels and associated GHG emissions reduction. This framework consists of two interrelated models: a maritime transport model, which simulates freight transport processes, including freight demand, traffic flow, fleet evolution, and GHG emissions, and a green finance support model, which quantifies the mechanism of green credit and carbon trading on increasing shipping companies’ intention to use alternative-fuel vessels. The proposed model is applied to a feeder vessel fleet serving a major seaport in China. The results show that the implementation of green credit significantly accelerates the penetration of alternative-fuel vessels and reduces GHG emissions from the vessel fleet. In contrast, carbon trading shows a weaker effect on mitigating GHG emissions than green credit primarily due to its low price. The sensitivity analysis reveals that other factors, such as vessel price, the pace of the greening of methanol, and price of conventional fuels also significantly influence GHG emissions from the vessel fleet. These results indicate that a combination of multiple green financial instruments can facilitate the decarbonization of maritime transport sectors.

References

[1] IMO. Energy efficiency of ships: Report of fuel oil consumption data submitted to the IMO Ship Fuel Oil Consumption Database in GISIS 2024a.

[2] IMO. 2023 IMO Strategy on Reduction of GHG Emissions from Ships 2023.

[3] Balcombe P, Staffell I, Kerdan IG, Speirs JF, Brandon NP, Hawkes AD. How can LNG-fuelled ships meet decarbonisation targets? An environmental and economic analysis. Energy 2021; 227: 120462.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.120462

[4] Du Y, Shen X, Kammen DM, Ding X. Cost-competitive offshore wind-powered green methanol production for maritime transport decarbonization. Nature Communications 2025; 16: 5453.

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-60608-5

[5] DNV. Alternative Fuels for Containerships 2021.

[6] Xu S, Ju K, Wang J, Liu H. Comprehensive evaluation and selection strategy of alternative fuel power systems in ships. Journal of Shanghai Maritime University 2024; 45: 81-88.

[7] Center for green finance research of Tsinghua NIFR. Green finance: policies and instruments. China Translation & Publishing House 2022.

[8] Song D-P. A Literature Review of Seaport Decarbonisation: Solution Measures and Roadmap to Net Zero. Sustainability 2024; 16: 1620.

https://doi.org/10.3390/su16041620

[9] Brand S, Steinbrecher J. Green bonds–a sustainable alternative for municipal infrastructure finance. KfW Research, Focus on Economics 2019; 7: 1-5.

[10] Christodoulou A, Cullinane K. The prospects for, and implications of, emissions trading in shipping. Maritime Economics & Logistics 2024; 26: 168-184.

https://doi.org/10.1057/s41278-023-00261-1

[11] Gavalas D. Green finance frameworks for sustainable shipping industry and blue economy: A review. Maritime Technology and Research 2025; 7: 277132.

https://doi.org/10.33175/mtr.2025.277132

[12] DNV. What are the total costs of ownership for different methanol-fuelled containership designs 2024?

[13] Anantharaman M, Sardar A, Islam R. Decarbonization of Shipping and Progressing Towards Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions to Net Zero: A Bibliometric Analysis. Sustainability 2025; 17: 2936.

https://doi.org/10.3390/su17072936

[14] Camargo-Díaz CP, Paipa-Sanabria E, Zapata-Cortes JA, Aguirre-Restrepo Y, Quiñones-Bolaños EE. A Review of Economic Incentives to Promote Decarbonization Alternatives in Maritime and Inland Waterway Transport Modes. Sustainability 2022; 14: 14405.

https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114405

[15] Meng B, Chen S, Haralambides H, Kuang H, Fan L. Information spillovers between carbon emissions trading prices and shipping markets: A time-frequency analysis. Energy Economics 2023; 120: 106604.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106604

[16] Morchio G, Notteboom T, Satta G, Vottero B. Green finance in bulk shipping. Maritime Policy & Management 2024; 52: 335-360.

https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2024.2321854

[17] Mnif E, Naifar N, Jarboui A. Green Finance, Clean Energy, and AI Synergies in Global Shipping Markets. Thunderbird International Business Review 2026; 1-19.

[18] Sigalas C, Gerakoudi K. Green finance and ESG-linked maritime debt: evidence from transaction-level data. Maritime Economics & Logistics 2026.

https://doi.org/10.1057/s41278-026-00350-x

[19] Ziakas A, Boile M. Accelerating ferry fleet renewal through green financing – the case of the Greek ferry network. Journal of Shipping and Trade 2026; 11: 9.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s41072-026-00232-8

[20] DNV. Maritime Forecast to 2050, The 9th edition ed 2025.

[21] Sterman J. System dynamics at sixty: the path forward. System Dynamics Review 2018; 34: 5-47.

https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.1601

[22] Zhu S, Hsieh C-H. Predictive modelling in the shipping industry: analysis from supply and demand sides. Maritime Business Review 2025; 10: 2-14.

https://doi.org/10.1108/MABR-04-2024-0038

[23] Kjeldsberg F, Munim ZH, Schramm H-J. Machine learning in freight rate forecasting: a systematic literature review. Maritime Economics & Logistics 2026; 1-31.

https://doi.org/10.1057/s41278-025-00334-3

[24] Rashed Y, Meersman H, Sys C, Van de Voorde E, Vanelslander T. A combined approach to forecast container throughput demand: Scenarios for the Hamburg-Le Havre range of ports. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 2018; 117: 127-141.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.08.010

[25] Dissanayake D, Morikawa T. Investigating household vehicle ownership, mode choice and trip sharing decisions using a combined revealed preference/stated preference Nested Logit model: case study in Bangkok Metropolitan Region. Journal of Transport Geography 2010; 18: 402-410.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2009.07.003

[26] Naumov S, Keith DR, Sterman JD. Accelerating vehicle fleet turnover to achieve sustainable mobility goals. Journal of Operations Management 2023; 69 36-66.

https://doi.org/10.1002/joom.1173

[27] Liu P, Wang C, Xie J, Mu D, Lim MK. Towards green port-hinterland transportation: Coordinating railway and road infrastructure in Shandong Province, China. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 2021; 94: 102806.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102806

[28] IMO. Resolution MEPC.391 (81): 2024 Guidelines on Life Cycle GHG Intensity of Marine Fuels, Marine Environment Protection Committee, 81st Session ed 2024b.

[29] Xiao X, Li F, Wang Y, Ji Y. Dynamic life-cycle assessment of marine methanol pathways for low-carbon shipping in China. Sustainable Production and Consumption 2026; 65: 142-151.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2026.04.001

[30] Barlas Y. Formal aspects of model validity and validation in system dynamics. System Dynamics Review 1996; 12: 183-210.

https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1727(199623)12:3<183::AID-SDR103>3.0.CO;2-4

[31] de Jong G, Vierth I, Tavasszy L, Ben-Akiva M. Recent developments in national and international freight transport models within Europe. Transportation 2012; 40: 347-371.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-012-9422-9

[32] Warren P. The role of climate finance beyond renewables: demand-side management and carbon capture, usage and storage. Climate Policy 2019; 19: 861-877.

https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2019.1605330

[33] Noussia K, Caine C, Richardson W. European regulatory and insurance aspects of carbon capture and storage. European Energy and Environmental Law Review 2022; 31: 383-393.

https://doi.org/10.54648/EELR2022024

Downloads

Published

2026-07-08

Issue

Section

Articles