Physics-Informed Residual Attention GRU for Short-Term Six-DOF Platform Motion Prediction of Floating Offshore Wind Turbines
Keywords:
Floating offshore wind turbine, short-term prediction, physics-informed learning, motion responseAbstract
Accurate short-term prediction of six-DOF platform motion is important for the state monitoring and health management of floating offshore wind turbines. This paper proposes a physics-informed residual attention GRU model, PI-Res Attn-GRU, for short-term six-DOF platform motion prediction. The model uses the preceding 10 s of platform motion to predict the subsequent 5 s. First, a GRU temporal encoder transforms the historical six-DOF motion sequence into a sequence of hidden representations. An Attention-Last State Fusion Module then combines an attention-pooled feature capturing key historical dynamics with the final hidden state representing the latest motion state, thereby forming a context representation for future prediction. A Step-Delta incremental decoder starts from the last observed state and recursively predicts motion increments to generate the future motion sequence. In addition, physics-informed constraint terms are incorporated into the training loss to promote boundary position continuity, initial velocity consistency, and acceleration smoothness. Experiments are conducted on 22 floating offshore wind turbine simulation cases. An eight-fold leave-one-wind-speed-out cross-validation procedure is applied to the development set for model selection, while cases at wind speeds of 8, 16, and 24 m/s are held out exclusively for testing. The final model achieves an MAE of 0.0333, an MSE of 0.0046, an RMSE of 0.0681, and an R² of 0.9939 on the test set. Compared with LSTM, the best-performing baseline model, PI-Res Attn-GRU reduces the MAE, MSE, and RMSE by 54.1%, 72.0%, and 47.1%, respectively. The results demonstrate that the proposed model can accurately predict short-term six-DOF platform motion and generalize well across different operating conditions.
References
[1] Li H, Diaz H, Guedes Soares C. A developed failure mode and effect analysis for floating offshore wind turbine support structures. Renewable Energy 2021; 164: 133-145.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.09.033
[2] Li H, Díaz H, Guedes Soares C. A failure analysis of floating offshore wind turbines using AHP-FMEA methodology. Ocean Engineering 2021; 234: 109261.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.109261
[3] Li H, Guedes Soares C, Huang H-Z. Reliability analysis of a floating offshore wind turbine using Bayesian Networks. Ocean Engineering 2020; 217: 107827.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107827
[4] Li H, Guedes Soares C. Assessment of failure rates and reliability of floating offshore wind turbines. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2022; 228: 108777.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2022.108777
[5] Li H, Huang C-G, Guedes Soares C. A real-time inspection and opportunistic maintenance strategies for floating offshore wind turbines. Ocean Engineering 2022; 256: 111433.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.111433
[6] Li H, Peng W, Huang C-G, Guedes Soares C. Failure Rate Assessment for Onshore and Floating Offshore Wind Turbines. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 2022; 10(12): 1965.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10121965
[7] Medina-Manuel A, Molina Sánchez R, Souto-Iglesias A. AI-Driven Model Prediction of Motions and Mooring Loads of a Spar Floating Wind Turbine in Waves and Wind. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 2024; 12(9): 1464.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12091464
[8] Palma G, Bardazzi A, Lucarelli A, Pilloton C, Serani A, Lugni C, Diez M. Analysis, Forecasting, and System Identification of a Floating Offshore Wind Turbine Using Dynamic Mode Decomposition. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 2025; 13(4): 656.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse13040656
[9] Dong Q, Zhang K, Chen M, Liu H, Luo W, Liu Y, Zhou H, Ren Z. Real-time motion prediction of a 5 MW floating offshore wind turbine using artificial neural networks integrated with time series decomposition. Ocean Engineering 2026; 343: 123301.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2025.123301
[10] Shi W, Hu L, Lin Z, Zhang L, Wu J, Chai W. Short-term motion prediction of floating offshore wind turbine based on muti-input LSTM neural network. Ocean Engineering 2023; 280: 114558.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.114558
[11] He G, Xue J, Zhao C, Cui T, Liu C. Deep learning based short-term motion prediction of floating wind turbine under shutdown condition. Applied Ocean Research 2024; 151: 104147.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2024.104147
[12] Yin J, Ding J, Yang Y, Yu J, Ma L, Xie W, Nie D, Bashir M, Liu Q, Li C, Li S. Wave-induced motion prediction of a deepwater floating offshore wind turbine platform based on Bi-LSTM. Ocean Engineering 2025; 315: 119836.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.119836
[13] Song B, Zhou Q, Chang R. Short-term motion prediction of FOWT based on time-frequency feature fusion LSTM combined with signal decomposition methods. Ocean Engineering 2025; 317: 120046.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.120046
[14] Deng S, Ning D, Mayon R. The motion forecasting study of floating offshore wind turbine using self-attention long short-term memory method. Ocean Engineering 2024; 310: 118709.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.118709
[15] Kang B, Park S, Kwon D. Interpretable prediction of floating offshore wind turbine dynamic responses: An attention-based deep learning approach. Ocean Engineering 2025; 335: 121703.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2025.121703
[16] Fan C, La X, Feng R, Mdemaya FAL, Xu G. Intelligent forecasting of motion responses of offshore floating wind turbines based on artificial intelligence. Ocean Engineering 2026; 349: 124103.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2025.124103
[17] Chen J, Gunawan D, Taylor PH, McCauley G, Zhao W. Attention-based machine learning for short-term motion prediction of a floating offshore wind turbine. Ocean Engineering 2026; 358: 125780.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2026.125780
[18] Chen R, Zhang K, Luo M, An Y, Guo L. Deep Learning-Based Prediction of Pitch Response for Floating Offshore Wind Turbines. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 2024; 12(12): 2198.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12122198
[19] Wang Z, Qiao D, Tang G, Wang B, Yan J, Ou J. An identification method of floating wind turbine tower responses using deep learning technology in the monitoring system. Ocean Engineering 2022; 261: 112105.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.112105
[20] Ahn H, Ha Y-J, Kim K-H. Load Evaluation for Tower Design of Large Floating Offshore Wind Turbine System According to Wave Conditions. Energies 2023; 16(4): 1862.